Quality of life comparison
If you lived in Sri Lanka instead of Western Sahara, you would:
Health
live 13.0 years longer
In Western Sahara, the average life expectancy is 64 years (62 years for men, 67 years for women) as of 2020. In Sri Lanka, that number is 78 years (75 years for men, 82 years for women) as of 2020.
Economy
make 5.2 times more money
Western Sahara has a GDP per capita of $2,500 as of 2007, while in Sri Lanka, the GDP per capita is $13,000 as of 2023.
Life
be 82.9% less likely to die during infancy
In Western Sahara, approximately 47.9 children (per 1,000 live births) die before they reach the age of one as of 2020. In Sri Lanka, on the other hand, 8.2 children do as of 2022.
have 48.2% fewer children
In Western Sahara, there are approximately 28.0 babies per 1,000 people as of 2020. In Sri Lanka, there are 14.5 babies per 1,000 people as of 2024.
Geography
see 20.7% more coastline
Western Sahara has a total of 1,110 km of coastline. In Sri Lanka, that number is 1,340 km.
The statistics above were calculated using the following data sources: The World Factbook.
Sri Lanka: At a glance
How big is Sri Lanka compared to Western Sahara? See an in-depth size comparison.